Diskussion:Nonlinear Opt.: KKT- theorem 5

Dear Group 5,

we read your wiki-entry and got some annotations for you: -You structured your entry very well and used many subsections which makes it easier to understand. -The language you used is comprehensive and plain. -Your chosen example explains the problem in a traceable way and your describtion of the solution is good.

All in all you did a good job and wrote a nice short wiki-entry. --schaffra (Diskussion) 20:53, 7. Jul. 2013 (CEST)

Hello Group 5, sorry our comment is a little late. You did a great job creating this wiki-article. You showed the hole problem of KKT, including (almost) every special case and your explanation was as well structured as detailed. The example you used to clarify KKT was quite abstract and complicated, but as you did before on the other parts, you showed again a good performance at this one. If there is anything that can be criticized, than it's that you skiped graphics. In summary it can be said, that it not only seem that you guys understood KKT quite well, but you were also able to explain it in a good manner. --klempnow (Diskussion) 13:54, 9. Jul. 2013 (CEST)